<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: StrokeDB Is A Global Database</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oleganza.wordpress.com/2008/05/01/strokedb-is-a-global-database/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oleganza.wordpress.com/2008/05/01/strokedb-is-a-global-database/</link>
	<description>Ruby, networking, distributed systems.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 06:36:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Oleg Andreev</title>
		<link>http://oleganza.wordpress.com/2008/05/01/strokedb-is-a-global-database/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Oleg Andreev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 06:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oleganza.wordpress.com/?p=6#comment-15</guid>
		<description>All xml-compatible output formats are okay: JSON, XML, YAML etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All xml-compatible output formats are okay: JSON, XML, YAML etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justin</title>
		<link>http://oleganza.wordpress.com/2008/05/01/strokedb-is-a-global-database/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 18:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oleganza.wordpress.com/?p=6#comment-12</guid>
		<description>I think this article should have been entitled, &quot;StrokeDB AS a Global Database&quot;, not IS... I think some people might be thrown off to think that its going to be implemented in that way from the start. And not provided to them for their own app/intranet architectures.

But I get the feel of what your saying. A &quot;Berners-Lee&quot; global data web is going to need a very good distributed data layer like your presenting here. But that also means we all will need to put a hand into this.

Any chance of outputting as other formats besides JSON? RDF maybe? I&#039;ll have to check the source again...

I would like to think more or less that it WILL BE a &quot;mega project&quot; after it first really gets some steam. Focus on perfecting those tiny bits first... ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this article should have been entitled, &#8220;StrokeDB AS a Global Database&#8221;, not IS&#8230; I think some people might be thrown off to think that its going to be implemented in that way from the start. And not provided to them for their own app/intranet architectures.</p>
<p>But I get the feel of what your saying. A &#8220;Berners-Lee&#8221; global data web is going to need a very good distributed data layer like your presenting here. But that also means we all will need to put a hand into this.</p>
<p>Any chance of outputting as other formats besides JSON? RDF maybe? I&#8217;ll have to check the source again&#8230;</p>
<p>I would like to think more or less that it WILL BE a &#8220;mega project&#8221; after it first really gets some steam. Focus on perfecting those tiny bits first&#8230; <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yurii Rashkovskii</title>
		<link>http://oleganza.wordpress.com/2008/05/01/strokedb-is-a-global-database/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Yurii Rashkovskii</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 08:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oleganza.wordpress.com/?p=6#comment-11</guid>
		<description>hk, I&#039;d say that while StrokeDB itself would be a *relatively* small project (not mega), but we foresee a way to build a kind of that global infrastructure using StrokeDB and companion projects. Hope that clarifies that &quot;megacy&quot; issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hk, I&#8217;d say that while StrokeDB itself would be a *relatively* small project (not mega), but we foresee a way to build a kind of that global infrastructure using StrokeDB and companion projects. Hope that clarifies that &#8220;megacy&#8221; issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oleg Andreev</title>
		<link>http://oleganza.wordpress.com/2008/05/01/strokedb-is-a-global-database/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Oleg Andreev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 08:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oleganza.wordpress.com/?p=6#comment-10</guid>
		<description>hk: thanks for the feedback!

StrokeDB is an engine for a distributed database i&#039;m working on right now. It is a mega-project from the very start (back in January 2008). 

I&#039;ll make some examples soon to clarify the idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hk: thanks for the feedback!</p>
<p>StrokeDB is an engine for a distributed database i&#8217;m working on right now. It is a mega-project from the very start (back in January 2008). </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll make some examples soon to clarify the idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hk</title>
		<link>http://oleganza.wordpress.com/2008/05/01/strokedb-is-a-global-database/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>hk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 08:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oleganza.wordpress.com/?p=6#comment-9</guid>
		<description>I must admit I don&#039;t understand this post at all. I hope you&#039;re not announcing that you&#039;re abandoning StrokeDB development in favour of some kind of Xanadu-esque vision of global document tracking...

And as for saying there&#039;s only one huge distributed StrokeDB database across the whole world .. huh?

I guess I&#039;ll wait for clarification before criticising but I really hope you can keep your focus on developing a good ruby-based document DB rather than trying to turn it into some kind of mega-project which will never be finished .. I speak from grim experience here : /</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must admit I don&#8217;t understand this post at all. I hope you&#8217;re not announcing that you&#8217;re abandoning StrokeDB development in favour of some kind of Xanadu-esque vision of global document tracking&#8230;</p>
<p>And as for saying there&#8217;s only one huge distributed StrokeDB database across the whole world .. huh?</p>
<p>I guess I&#8217;ll wait for clarification before criticising but I really hope you can keep your focus on developing a good ruby-based document DB rather than trying to turn it into some kind of mega-project which will never be finished .. I speak from grim experience here : /</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Владимир</title>
		<link>http://oleganza.wordpress.com/2008/05/01/strokedb-is-a-global-database/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Владимир</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 07:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oleganza.wordpress.com/?p=6#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Okay, already want it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, already want it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
